Hi,
I was reading your comments on the Baby Quasar and I was hoping you could be of some help. I tried reading the article you referred to in the Photochemical and Photobiological Sciences journal. It was really hard to interpret without being familiar with all the technical jargon.
I was hoping you could tell me how much LED light the article found to be too much. I know you said that too much exposure to it has a negative effect and I'm wondering what exactly too much refers to (how many minutes/hours and on what wavelength).
I've been using the Marvel Mini for a while and love the results. When I bought it the salesperson said that I could pretty much use it as much as I wanted and it wouldn't have any negative effects. I use it about 4 times a week.
I was really hoping to get the Baby Quasar, but am hesitant. Does a higher number wavelength mean that it is more potent? Or is it the lower that number the higher the potency? So for instance, is 630 more powerful or less powerful than 1200 nm?
Couldn't I use the Baby Quasar on the safer wavelength, since it looks like you can choose the settings yourself?
Thanks so much for your help Jean!
Des
============================================
Here is my response about LED wand safety.
Tags: Quasar Baby, Marvel Mini, photodynamic therapy, phototherapy, anti-aging appliances, anti-aging research, LED treatment
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Click here to post a comment on: Are LED Treatments Safe and Effective? - Part One